If there’s one thing you should take away from this situation, it’s the title. But you should really read Christina’s whole excellent post on polyamory and Newt Gingrich.
About the Author
Jen McCreight (it rhymes with "write") is a geeky, nerdy, atheist feminist who managed to escape Indiana for Seattle.
Email: jen (at) thejenome (dot) com
17 comments
joshuakundert says:
Jan 21, 2012
Bad Link… apparently through all of FrBl–since when I search on it–it also comes back broken from the main FrBl site..
Too bad too.. because it looks interesting!
Azkyroth says:
Jan 21, 2012
…clueless, self-righteous people do it, and insist that you’re just brainwashed if you don’t agree?
ambassadorfromverdammt says:
Jan 21, 2012
The moral bankruptcy of the Religious Right appears to be spreading like a toxic ooze.
It’s a good thing there are Champions of Justice like Faux News to stem the tide (cough sputter die of a heart attack).
Jaws says:
Jan 21, 2012
It’s not the comparison to polyamory that’s repulsive… it’s Newt.
ambassadorfromverdammt says:
Jan 21, 2012
The polyamory label is an attempt to lessen the impact of the screamifying character of Newt. That makes it repulsive too.
Would it be wrong to wish that someone would shoot Newt and bury him under a toilet so people could shit on his grave whenever they wished?
H.D. Lynn says:
Jan 21, 2012
I was watching The Last Word, and I was appalled at how they kept referring to Gingrich being in an ‘open marriage.’ The guest said no woman would ever consider an open marriage! What Gingrich did was CHEATING. He wasn’t in an open marriage. He ASKED for an open marriage, but he was CHEATING. Let’s call it what it is.
Hibernia86 says:
Jan 22, 2012
I agree. The press seems to think the shocking thing was the idea of the open marriage, not the fact that Gingrich only asked for it after he had been caught cheating. That critical point, that it was only requested AFTER he was caught in adultery, is almost never in the title of the articles.
Skepgineer, rusty knife of a thousand porcupines says:
Jan 22, 2012
uh, no. The issue is consent.
Azkyroth says:
Jan 23, 2012
You need your sarcasm detector calibrated, among other things.
Svlad Cjelli says:
Jan 24, 2012
Only if you’re a wizard.
Svlad Cjelli says:
Jan 24, 2012
Pfft, who cares about how he treats people? The important issue is the details of his sex-life.
Jade Falcon says:
Feb 15, 2012
Hey, when he pledges to get out of everyone else’s bedrooms (legislatively and “morally” speaking), then we’ll agree to get out of his.
Until then, well, turnabout is fair play.
Domina Boot says:
May 25, 2012
I want I could write posts such as you do , your article is rather nice and beneficial thank you !
Ok Mandella says:
Jul 4, 2012
I personally just like what you have acquired beneath, undoubtedly for example the pain you might be expressing as well as the way in places you state this.
Harriett Mansouri says:
Jul 26, 2012
Positive, your personal blogposts is remarkably exceptional,we comparable to this!
Freddie Sobania says:
Jul 27, 2012
In a position to start off acquiring some important visitors to your website?
All Under One Roof says:
Apr 20, 2020
What a silly idea, asking the people involved what they think and feel about a situation. Who came up with that ptcl speed test
? I am sure all the little people agree. ;)